By now, about everyone has heard about the story of Cindy Sheehan, who lost her son, Casey, in Iraq in April 2004, and her vigil in front of the President's ranch in Crawford, TX, asking for (another) meeting with the President, even thought she had a meetin with him and gave high praise to him. But now there is a change in her tune. The liberal media is lapping his up like Winne the Pooh eating honey.

She claims the the President lied to the American public over the reasons for going in and liberating Iraq. The only lie that I see is the stuff coming out from the left (cooking up the intel, forcing analysts to makeup stuff, etc.).

The most disgusting thing about this is that she is using (or abusing, depending on your views) her son's memory for political gain. Even her own family has come out adgainst her vigil. (http://www.drudgereport.com/flashcs.htm" title="http://www.drudgereport.com/flashcs.htm" target="_blank"http://www.drudgereport.com/f...)

While I feel for her loss, and I don't blame her for being upset about her son's death, it is disingenuious to Casey's memory to use it to attack the President. (Casey willingly reenlisted to stay in Iraq.)

After a while, the media will go after another anti-Bush story and Cindy will all but be forgotten.